[There are two
propositions we must reject, every time they are uttered: “I am personally
opposed to abortion, but I cannot impose my religious beliefs on others” and “I
will not politicize the Eucharist.”
The first proposition is
the mantra of dissident Catholic politicians; the second is the errant voice of
cowardly shepherds. Both are absolutely sinful and evil.
Our Bishops must speak the
Truth with one unanimous voice. This is an issue
close to my heart and often in my thoughts. That is why I imagined having the following
experience and why this post is much longer than my normal offering:]
Judge: Counselor would you like to cross examine his Eminence?
Counselor: Yes, indeed. Thank
you, your Honor. Bishop we all know how difficult your responsibilities are and
the many challenges you face each day ministering to your flock. Even Solomon
would be sorely tested.
Bishop: Thank you, counselor.
Counselor: I am going to
ask you a series of questions. None of these are trick questions They all have
clear and unambiguous answers. All I ask of you is that you respond to each
question truthfully.
Bishop: Certainly, I would not do otherwise.
Counselor: I am sure of that. As a Bishop in the
Catholic Church, do you believe everything that the Catholic Church teaches?
Bishop: Absolutely – “every
issue on faith and
morals that is doctrinal in nature and is solemnly or formally
proposed by the Church.”
Counselor: You would feel bound to follow Scripture I
assume?
Bishop: Without hesitancy.
Counselor: You would
consider the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) and the Code of Canon Law to
be authoritative and binding also, am I correct?
Bishop: Of course.
Counselor: In fact, when
you were ordained a bishop, you took an oath, did you not, to “maintain the
observance of all ecclesiastical laws, especially those contained in the Code
of Canon Law”?
Bishop: Yes, I did.
Counselor: Now let us get a few essential Truths of
the Catholic Faith on the record before we proceed further.
Bishop: Fine.
Counselor: Am I correct
that the primary mission of the Catholic Church is the salvation of souls?
Bishop: Yes. That tenet is embodied in the Code of Canon
Law in Canon 1752.
Counselor: Would I be
accurate to conclude then that nothing is more important to you as a Bishop
than the salvation of every soul?
Bishop: You would be one hundred per cent correct.
Counselor: Next to the
salvation of souls, you are most concerned about protecting human life from the
moment of conception to natural death, am I correct?
Bishop: Most certainly.
Counselor: You would
never intentionally do anything that would place your soul or the soul of anyone
else at risk of eternal damnation just to be “pastoral” would you?
Bishop: I would not be
fulfilling my primary obligation as a Bishop if I acted in such an
irresponsible manner.
Counselor: Sin is a personal matter, correct?
Bishop: Yes.
Counselor: But you and I,
do we not have a “responsibility for the sins committed by others when we
cooperate with them: by participating directly and voluntarily in them; by
ordering, advising, praising, or approving them; by not disclosing or not
hindering them when we have an obligation to do so; and by protecting
evil-doers?”
Bishop: I see you have
done your homework, counselor. Right out of Section 1868 of the Catechism of
the Catholic Church.
Counselor: Yes, indeed
your Eminence, a book you and faithful Catholics no doubt frequently turn to
when in need of direction. Doesn’t Scripture also tell us that we will be held
accountable for our silence if we do not warn someone of their sinful acts?
Bishop: Yes, Ezekiel makes that clear. If you give me
a Bible, I can find the exact quote for you. [Handing a Bible to the witness,
who thumbs through it and says:] Yes, here it is. Ezekiel 33.8-9.
Counselor: Can you read that Scripture to us your
Eminence?
Bishop: “When I say to
the wicked, ‘You will certainly die,’ and you do not warn him or speak out to
warn the wicked from his wicked way so that he may live, that wicked person
shall die for wrongdoing, but his blood I will require from your hand. However,
if you have warned the wicked and he does not turn from his wickedness or from
his wicked way, he shall die for wrongdoing, but you have saved yourself.”
Counselor: No ambiguity there!
Bishop: None
Counselor: Killing a child in the mother’s womb is a
grave, mortal sin, is it not?
Bishop: Without a doubt.
Counselor: Abortion is always intrinsically evil, am I
correct?
Bishop: Yes.
Counselor: It would be a
mortal sin for an elected Catholic official to, among other things, support
abortion, or extend the length of time in which abortions may be sought or
require public funding of abortions?
Bishop: Yes. That conclusion is beyond dispute.
Counselor: So, the “I am
personally opposed to abortion but can’t impose my religious beliefs is not a
“get out of hell card”?
Bishop: No. Unless that
sin is confessed and absolved through a sacramental confession during that
politician’s lifetime, it is a ticket to eternal damnation.
Counselor: Should a Catholic who engages in the
conduct I just described and who has not gone to confession and received
absolution receive Holy Communion?
Bishop: No. He would
receive no spiritual benefit from such an egregious act. To do so would be to
receive Communion unworthily - a mortal sin. It would also be a sacrilege, an
additional mortal sin. Quoting St. Paul, Section 1385 of the Catechism of the
Catholic Church makes that clear: “Whoever, therefore eats the bread or drinks
the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body
and blood of the Lord. Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and
drink of the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body
eats and drinks judgment upon himself.” The reception of Holy Communion by
those who publicly and obstinately violate the moral law is a particularly
grave form of sacrilege.
Counselor: That is what St. Paul taught, am I correct?
Bishop: Yes, Section 2120
of CCC states that “Sacrilege is a grave sin especially when committed against
the Eucharist, for in this sacrament the true Body of Christ is made substantially
present to us.” Such an act constitutes a serious scandal for others and only
merits eternal punishment for the one who receives unworthily.
Counselor: Is it true, your Eminence, that Canon
915 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law forbids the administration of Holy Communion to those [among others, my emphasis] who obstinately
persist in manifest grave sin.
Bishop: Yes.
Counselor: Withholding Communion
then to one who obstinately persists in manifest grave sin
is not optional, but is mandated by Canon Law, am I correct?
Bishop: Yes, you are.
Counselor: In fact, withholding Communion under the
circumstances we have been discussing is not a political act but an act of
charity, an attempt to save a soul, right?
Bishop: Yes, undeniably.
Counselor: Does Canon Law
provide any exception to this mandate to withhold Communion from those who
obstinately persist in manifest grave sin?
Bishop: None.
Counselor: Can it ever be considered “pastoral” to
facilitate the commission of a mortal sin and a sacrilege?
Bishop: Certainly not.
Counselor: Under the
circumstances we have been discussing then, it would be a sacrilege – a mortal
sin – both for the person receiving Communion unworthily and for the person
who knowingly distributes Communion to one who obstinately persists in manifest grave sin?
Bishop: Yes
Counselor: Your Eminence, is there any possibility at
all that anything you have said today is not true?
Bishop: Every syllable I
uttered today contains only the irrefutable and
unchanging Truth – God’s Truth - which all professing to be Catholic must
accept.
Counselor: One final question, your Eminence.
Bishop: Yes, sir.
Counselor: With no intent
to embarrass you or other silent bishops, but solely in hope of saving souls, I
must ask: Why then not publicly and fraternally correct your errant brother
bishops who refuse to follow Canon Law and are thereby facilitating sacrilegious
Communions and the loss of souls?
Bishop: [Silence]
.jpg)
